Letter to William Osler from Hugh Thursfield, 84, Wimpole Street, Cavendish Square, London, England. Thursfield, along with many others, is furious that his name was published as a contributor to the "Family Encyclopedia of Medicine." He demands that his name be withdrawn and a public apology made.

Letter to William Osler from J.A. Ormerod, Registrar, Royal College of Physicians, Pall Mall East, London, England. Ormerod seeks assurance that Osler's name was used by the publishers of the "Family Encyclopedia of Medicine" without his knowledge or consent. He urges Osler to have his name removed from the publication immediately.

Letter to William Osler from J.A. Ormerod, Registrar, Royal College of Physicians, Pall Mall, London, England. Ormerod informs Osler that his resignation from the Royal College of Physicians has to be accepted by the College during the next meeting, according to College rules.

Letter to William Osler from James Neal, Deputy Medical Secretary, British Medical Association, 429 Strand, London, England. The Central Ethical Committee will conduct an enquiry into the publication and issue of the "Family Encyclopedia of Medicine." Neal asks Osler to provide information and an explanation of his involvement in the affair to the Committee. Includes manuscript notes.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, 1, West Franklin Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Osler remarks that Flick finally got his way at the meeting of the Tuberculosis Committee. Osler writes about the proposed new Journal of Tuberculosis, for which he would like to secure the support of the Phipps Institute. He feels it should be an independent organization, supported by the societies and the men involved in Tuberculosis work.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Arrangements for the upcoming meeting of the Unites States Society for the Study of Tuberculosis.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Osler would like Biggs to look over Sternberg's proposed constitution and by-laws before the next meeting of the United States Society for the Study of Tuberculosis.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, 1, West Franklin Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Osler will do anything he can to help bring the International Congress on Tuberculosis to the U.S. He does not know anything about the American Congress of Tuberculosis, but has heard that it is not in the hands of the right men.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, 1, West Franklin Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Osler has just heard from Magnin in Paris that the International Congress on Tuberculosis has been postponed until 1905. Because two Congresses cannot be held in the same year, plans to bring the International Congress to the U.S. will have to be put off until 1906.

Letter to Lawrence F. Flick from William Osler, 1, West Franklin Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Arrangements for Osler's upcoming lecture in Philadelphia. He reports that the rivalry over the Tuberculosis question has intensified. After Osler informed people in Paris that there would be no Congress on Tuberculosis in the U.S. in 1905, he saw in the paper that Daniel Lewis's Congress has been postponed until 1905. Osler believes that a national committee should be organized to take charge of the entire issue.